
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12439/2843
Title: | Research-related knowledge, understanding and practice in public mental health: the voices of social workers and occupational therapists. | Northern Health Authors: | Christine Migliorini; Megan Turville; Caitlin McDowell; JoAnne Bevilacqua; Carol Harvey | Northern Health first author: | Christine Migliorini | Northern Health last author: | Carol Harvey | Northern Health affiliation: | (Migliorini, Turville, McDowell, Bevilacqua, Harvey) Division of Mental Health, North West Area Mental Health, Northern Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia | Authors: | Migliorini C.; Turville M.; McDowell C.; Bevilacqua J.; Harvey C. | Citation: | Health Research Policy and Systems. 22(1) (no pagination), 2024. Article Number: 92. Date of Publication: December 2024. | Issue Date: | 1-Dec-2024 | Abstract: | Introduction: Previous studies have explored facilitators and barriers to research conducted by allied health professionals in general medical settings. Since the mental health system is acknowledged to be significantly under-funded and more poorly functioning than general medical services, it is unclear whether the published facilitators and barriers also apply to mental health settings. This study sought to explore the research-related knowledge, understanding and practices of allied mental health clinicians based in a large public mental health service. Method(s): A mixed methods study recruited 59 occupational therapists and social workers working in a dedicated metropolitan public mental health service in Melbourne, Australia. Quantitative survey results are reported elsewhere. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 survey responder volunteers. Thematic analysis was conducted on the qualitative survey and interview data. Result(s): Four main themes were identified: research must connect with clinical practice; fragments of knowledge; research in practice; and research is not part of my professional identity. The third theme, research in practice, comprised four subthemes: no time for research in clinical roles, missing communication, lack of ownership, and what I need to do research. Conclusion(s): This study found that research and research-related activities were not considered part of the mental health social workers and occupational therapists' professional identities. Dealing with this issue may be instrumental to the realization of these clinicians' professional peak-body associations' code of practice and to government mandated practice standards. We provided several strategies to encourage both clinicians and services to view research-related activities as an everyday part of clinical roles. This is especially important if we think of allied health evidence-based practice requiring a reasonable level of research-related skills and/or competencies to appraise, practice, evaluate and adapt their evidence-based practice.Copyright � The Author(s) 2024. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12439/2843 | DOI: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01195-7 | PubMed URL: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39103820/ | Type: | Journal article | Keywords: | Australia cultural anthropology mental health |
Study/Trial: | Observational study (cohort, case-control, cross sectional, or survey) | Access Rights: | Free article | Place of publication: | United Kingdom |
Appears in Collections: | Articles |
Show full item record
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.